http://gay-bible.org/write/3_another-hetero-xmas.htm

It is totally disingenuous of Mr. Keane’s attorneys to request you remove your Family Circus parodies on the absurd claim that it hurts the feelings of his fans who simply adore that comic strip. As if any of those folks would ever bother to view your site, let alone that particular parody. Maybe they found it via a search engine, and got their Fascist brown panties up in a bunch.

Your Family Circus parody was brilliant and a delight. Certainly worth defending against the legalistic hegemony of certain people of power and influence, that seek to wipe out any form of free speech that should flutter into their radar zone like a happy little butterfly…and get instantly squashed by their pudgy little greedy little fist.

Had you stood your ground, most likely Chicago’s Legal Comic Book Defense Fund would have take your case gratis, and won…just as they so expertly did for my Pee Nuts parody. In acquiescing so swiftly and obligingly to Keane’s un-Amerikan request, you also weakened the rights (to free speech and fair use) of all artists of satire, everywhere. Way to go, sparky!

I meant “rimming” not “reaming”. lmfao

FYI, my reason for calling you a homophobe has nothing to do with jealousy issues. Has everything to do w/your own gay cartoon sketch, which filename you gave of “knocknuts”. That surely smacks of anti-gay bigotry…otherwise you’d've name that file “gaycartoon”, “zekescartoon” or something equally inoffensive.

Your flippant critique of my Pee Nuts cartoon was poisoned by your bigotry, and was not a fair evaluation. Many people have enjoyed my Pee Nuts parody, and gotten a good belly laugh out of it.

That fact that you accuse me of being motivated by anger when there is no evidence of this, speaks volumes. I am simply amused how I stumbled onto your more recent online ventures, after all these years. Reminds of that old saw:

“The chickens came home to roost.”

Or even:

“What goes around comes around.”

I’m sure Mr. Keane appreciates having his arse licked. I’m sure you do a pretty good job of reaming him, too.

Since I’ve NEVER sold out to anyone, my writing has not been sacrificed to the Demons of Obeisance, but has instead flourished. My latest is also comedy, and writ as yet one more satire of heterocentric dogma:

Yes, Virginia, Santa Claus is Gay
http://tinyurl.com/8xl4nrl

p.s.: still hilarious you think I’m a homophobe just for thinking you’re not funny

So where are all your Christian fans supporting you for your conversion? Where are the favorable comments? No wonder you’re shutting down. And to think it all goes back to when you caved in to Bill Keane. LOL

Thanks for reminding me, though. I miss the goddamn weirdos I’ve seen over the years. You got Mahir in there?

When my daughter was in daycare, occasionally parents would stop right in the “Fire Lane/No Parking” zone in front of the doors, put their hazard lights on, and go inside. Their defense was, “Well, I’m just picking up my child”, to which the proper reply was “That’s what everyone who’s not working here is doing”. It’s not like anyone hangs out at the daycare for an hour or so.

And why people think putting their blinkers on is a magical defense against tickets (+100 resist?) I’m not sure. It’s like they’re acknowledging that they’re doing something wrong and that acknowledgement somehow excuses it.

Much love nonetheless.

http://forums.officer.com/forums/showthread.php?128589-Is-it-legal-for-firefighters-to-smash-your….&p=1961344&viewfull=1#post1961344

Though to be specific, I wasn’t parked in front of it like this anyway. I was stopped with my blinkers on, that for sure would’ve been a ticketable distance if I was just parked there, but I don’t think I was fully blocking it. I’m not fully in the clear on this, but it’s no reason for her to be a pissy authoritarian bitch about it, either.

Derp I can’t believe I pated the same link, but I’m glad you found the rebuttal anyway.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6014022229458915912

Hoses through the windows, though, I saw that movie. Was that based on an actual incident?

As for the videos, though, those are both the same link?

Regarding the cop stuff:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4097602514885833865#
and the follow-up
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4097602514885833865#

So I guess I was playing (‘p) without a guitar (q), what would that be?

However, I am torn as to whether not “without pretending to play” would mean actually playing or just using the guitar as a prop. Either way, I am not sure having a fake guitar would qualify.

I apologize for letting the math teacher tendencies off the leash long enough to respond to this!